Zygomatic Implants
Dental
Starting from
$7,000
Up to $18,000 depending on centre
Typical duration
5–10 days
Including pre-operative work-up
Content reviewed for medical accuracy by: Dr. Rodina Ainasoa · Medical Content Writer & Health Communications
Overview
Zygomatic implants are long titanium implants anchored into the cheekbone (zygoma) rather than the upper jaw, offering an alternative to bone grafting or sinus lift for patients with severe upper-jaw bone loss. Because the zygomatic bone is naturally dense, many patients can receive a fixed set of teeth within days of surgery, avoiding the months-long grafting and healing timeline required before a standard implant can be placed.
Your case is matched to a centre on the basis of clinical outcome data, not marketing. We coordinate every step — from pre-operative work-up to post-treatment follow-up — with a dedicated care coordinator.
What's included
Zygomatic Implants
Coordinated from
or message us on WhatsApp
No commitment required. Your data is never shared with third parties.
Zygomatic Implants vs. Bone Graft + Standard Implant
Patients with severe upper-jaw (maxillary) bone loss have historically needed bone grafting or a sinus lift before a standard implant could be placed. Zygomatic implants offer an alternative that anchors longer implants directly into the cheekbone (zygoma), bypassing the need for grafting in many cases. Here is how the two pathways compare.
| Parameter | Zygomatic Implants | Bone Graft + Standard Implant |
|---|---|---|
| Number of surgical stages | Typically placed in a single surgical session, often allowing a fixed provisional set of teeth within 24–48 hours. | Usually requires a separate grafting procedure first, followed by a healing period, and then a second surgery to place the standard implant. |
| Overall treatment timeline | Can deliver a fixed prosthesis within days to a few weeks of surgery, since it does not depend on new bone regenerating first. | Bone grafts typically need several months (often 4–9 months, longer for major sinus lifts) to integrate before an implant can even be placed, extending total treatment time considerably. |
| Best suited for | Patients with severe maxillary atrophy or resorption who want to avoid extensive grafting, have failed a prior bone graft, or need a faster path to fixed teeth. | Patients with moderate bone loss where grafting is expected to succeed, or who prefer a more conventional, incremental approach and can accommodate a longer overall timeline. |
| Reported success rates | A systematic review of the literature reported cumulative implant success rates of about 98.5% at under 1 year, 97.5% at 1–3 years, 96.8% at 3–5 years, and 96.1% beyond 5 years for zygomatic implants in severely atrophic maxillae. | Standard implants placed after successful grafting have well-documented long-term survival, but the grafting step itself carries its own risk of failure or incomplete integration, which can require repeat grafting before an implant is even attempted. |
| Complexity & surgeon requirements | A more technically demanding procedure requiring a surgeon specifically trained and experienced in zygomatic implant placement and 3D surgical planning. | Uses more widely available bone-grafting and standard-implant techniques, though outcomes still depend heavily on surgeon experience. |
The Procedure: Step by Step
The steps below outline a typical zygomatic implant journey for a patient with severe upper-jaw bone loss. Your oral and maxillofacial surgeon will confirm the exact plan based on your CT imaging and bone anatomy.
3D imaging and surgical planning
A CT or CBCT scan of the jaw and cheekbone is taken and used to plan the precise trajectory for each implant, since zygomatic implants must be angled to anchor securely into the dense bone of the zygoma rather than the atrophied maxilla.
Implant placement surgery
Under general anaesthesia or deep sedation, one or more long implants (typically 30–52.5mm) are placed through the upper jaw and angled to engage the zygomatic bone, following the pre-planned trajectory. This is usually done as a single surgical session, sometimes combined with two shorter standard implants in the front of the jaw.
Immediate or early provisional loading
Because zygomatic implants anchor into dense cortical bone, many patients receive a fixed provisional (temporary) set of teeth within 24–48 hours of surgery, rather than waiting months as with conventional implants.
Healing and final prosthesis
After a healing period of several months to allow full stabilisation, the provisional prosthesis is replaced with the final, custom-made fixed bridge.
Recovery Timeline
Swelling (particularly around the cheeks and under the eyes), bruising, and discomfort are common in the first week and are managed with prescribed pain relief and cold compresses; most patients can eat only soft or liquid foods during this time.
Swelling and bruising generally subside, and most patients return to normal daily activities, while continuing to favour a soft diet around the provisional prosthesis.
The implants continue to stabilise within the zygomatic and maxillary bone during this period; regular follow-up visits monitor healing and the fit of the provisional teeth.
Once full stabilisation is confirmed, the provisional prosthesis is exchanged for the final fixed bridge, which can then function like conventional fixed teeth with routine dental check-ups and hygiene.
Source: systematic reviews and cohort studies of zygomatic implant outcomes published via PubMed/NCBI (PMC); American Academy of Implant Dentistry patient-education materials. Individual recovery varies and is guided by your treating oral and maxillofacial surgeon.
Known Risks & Limitations
- Long-term success is high but not universal: published cohort data report five-year implant survival of roughly 96–97% in patients with maxillary atrophy, with success continuing to be tracked over longer follow-up periods.
- The most commonly reported complications in the peer-reviewed literature are soft-tissue dehiscence (gum recession exposing part of the implant), sinusitis/rhinosinusitis, and prosthetic (denture or bridge) failures rather than implant loss itself.
- Because the implant passes close to the sinus and orbital (eye socket) region, this is a technically demanding procedure with a narrower margin for error than standard implant placement, and requires a surgeon with specific zygomatic-implant training.
- As with any oral surgery performed under general anaesthesia or deep sedation, there are anaesthesia-related risks, infection, and bleeding risks that your surgical team will screen for and discuss with you individually.
- Zygomatic implants are generally reserved for patients with severe bone loss where grafting is undesirable, has already failed, or would add unacceptable delay — they are not typically offered as a first option for patients with adequate bone volume.
Source: systematic reviews of zygomatic implant outcomes via PubMed/NCBI (PMC); peer-reviewed oral and maxillofacial surgery literature. No procedure is without risk; your treating surgeon will review your individual case.
A Note on Robotic-Assisted Placement
Robotic-assisted (computer-assisted) systems for zygomatic implant placement are an active area of research and early clinical use, not yet a routine standard. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis found that robotic-assisted placement achieved significantly better planned-versus-placed accuracy than dynamic navigation across a small number of in vitro and early clinical studies, and small clinical case series have reported successful placements with robotic guidance. This remains a specialised, less widely available option compared with conventional freehand or static-guide placement, which is why it is not offered as a standard CureSureMedico pathway at this time.
The CureSureMedico Care Pathway
Remote case review
Share your dental CT/CBCT scan, history of bone loss or prior failed grafts, and relevant medical history with our coordination team, who forward your case for an initial review of candidacy for zygomatic implants versus a grafting pathway.
Surgeon matching
We match you with an accredited oral and maxillofacial surgeon or implant specialist with specific zygomatic implant experience and 3D surgical planning capability, and share their case history for your review.
Cost estimate and travel planning
We issue a consolidated cost estimate covering imaging, surgery, and the provisional prosthesis, and help plan a single primary trip covering surgery and early provisional loading, with a shorter follow-up trip months later for the final prosthesis.
Surgery and provisional teeth
You attend your implant placement surgery, and where clinically appropriate receive a fixed provisional set of teeth within 24–48 hours before returning home to heal.
Follow-up and final prosthesis
Once your surgeon confirms the implants are fully stabilised, typically several months later, you travel back for your final fixed bridge to be fitted, with records shared with your home-country dentist for ongoing care.
Global cost comparison — Zygomatic Implants
Average coordinated costs across our partner centres. Final pricing depends on clinical complexity and chosen hospital.
| Country | Avg. cost | vs. cheapest |
|---|---|---|
🇹🇷 Turkey Istanbul | $9,000 | +13%chevron_right |
🇲🇽 Mexico Mexico City | $11,000 | +38%chevron_right |
🇮🇳 India New Delhi · Chennai · Bengaluru · Hyderabad · Mumbai · Kochi | $8,000 | —chevron_right |
Costs are indicative estimates and vary by procedure specifics, hospital, and clinical complexity. Request a personalised estimate for your specific case.
Frequently asked questions
Zygomatic implants are generally considered for patients with severe upper-jaw (maxillary) bone loss who want to avoid a lengthy bone-grafting or sinus-lift process, or whose prior graft has failed. Patients with moderate bone loss where a standard graft-and-implant pathway is expected to succeed are often better suited to that more conventional route. Your surgeon will review your CT/CBCT scan to determine which pathway is appropriate for your anatomy — this is a clinical decision made case by case, not a self-selection.
No fees. No commitment.
Our guidance is completely free
We are compensated by our partner hospitals — never by patients. You get independent clinical matching, cost transparency, and end-to-end coordination at no cost to you.