Pelvic Floor Reconstruction

Pelvic mesh has been a subject of significant regulatory scrutiny, and several countries (including the UK and Australia) have restricted its use for transvaginal prolapse repair following reports of complications including mesh erosion and chronic pain. However, mesh used in specific contexts — such as sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse (placed abdominally, not transvaginally) and mid-urethral slings for stress incontinence — continues to have strong evidence and safety profiles. If you prefer a mesh-free approach, native tissue repair techniques such as sacrospinous fixation and uterosacral ligament suspension are excellent alternatives with good long-term outcomes. Our partner urogynecologists will discuss all options transparently during your consultation, including their individual success rates and your personal risk profile.